Roszczenia społeczności

Część I - The claims of community Część II - Gdzie leży nasza lojalność

PART ONE: THE CLAIMS OF COMMUNITY

Professor Sandel presents Kant’s objections to Aristotle’s theory. Kant believes politics must respect individual freedom. People must always respect other people’s freedom to make their own choices—a universal duty to humanity—but for Kant, there is no other source of moral obligation. The discussion of Kant’s view leads to an introduction to the communitarian philosophy. Communitarians argue that, in addition to voluntary and universal duties, we also have obligations of membership, solidarity, and loyalty. These obligations are not necessarily based on consent. We inherit our past, and our identities, from our family, city, or country. But what happens if our obligations to our family or community come into conflict with our universal obligations to humanity? 

PART TWO: WHERE OUR LOYALTY LIES

Professor Sandel leads a discussion about the arguments for and against obligations of solidarity and membership. Do we owe more to our fellow citizens that to citizens of other countries? Is patriotism a virtue, or a prejudice for one’s own kind? If our identities are defined by the particular communities we inhabit, what becomes of universal human rights? Using various scenarios, students debate whether or not obligations of loyalty can ever outweigh universal duties of justice.

Lista lektur:

Aristotle, The Politics

Powrót do: Sprawiedliwość - Justice

Nie możesz skupić się na wykładzie? Plusssz Active poprawia koncentrację. Więcej »

Oglądaj wykład:

Podziel się artykułem w swoim ulubionym serwisie: facebook blip śledzik wykop

Brak komentarzy